Digital Desire
Published on 11-18-06. Reviewed by Snail.My Opinion
More and more pay sites are beginning to look like fashion magazines. Called glam sites, they are becoming among the most successful pay site on the World Wide Web, but it takes a lot of resources to put up a successful glam site. For me, there are two elements that make a glam site successful. First, you got to have beautiful models. (These models do not have to do hardcore sex in the site but they have to be outrageously good-looking.) Second, the quality of the images and videos have to be topnotch. HQ in a glam site really means high-quality, and not just the best quality the site's server can handle.
We'll see if Digital Desire satisfies these two elements.
When you first log in to the members' area you are immediately impressed by the site's fancy design. A lot of thought and money have been laid down to give it an aura of class. It's both beautiful and entertaining to navigate. Members use a flash menu with two bars sliding one on top of another. The effect is tasteful and extremely erotic.
The top bar includes the following menu: Premium, Specialty, Dailies, Videos and DDGX. Click Premium and the categories will slide to at the bottom. At first I was at a loss on which category I want to sample first: is it Covergirls, Dreamgirls, or Pornstars. Each selection seems as delectable as the other.
Finally I decided to click on the first one: Covergirls. The Covergirl of the day is Melissa Jacobs, a brown-haired dazzler whose picture sets can be viewed in four sizes. The best quality is probably too big for your desktop wallpaper. You can see the tiniest down and the smallest pore. Melissa Jacobs shaved pussy is a must-see at this quality.
But don't spend all your time on the Covergirls and its archives of 48 models, because there are other categories that you might find interesting: Dreamgirls, Creamgirls, Seasonal, Pornstars, Girlfriends, 19. Don't think the women in these other categories are inferior to the Covergirls. You'll find the Covergirl models in the other categories with only the ultimate 3000x3000 HQ images missing. I still find them all irresistible even at 1600x1600.
Digital Desire's other attraction is the videos of the models. HD Dreams has only three offerings so far but you just have to check out their 250 MB high-def clips. There more videos on Dream Flicks, Dream Session and Reel Encore. It's not high-def but the term HQ still definitely applies to the combined 140+ videos, especially when played on high-resolution. You'll need Quicktime or WM Player.
DigitalDesire hardcore offering can be found at the DDGX link, just in case you want to see some of the models taking a cock.
ConclusionDigital Desire passes both the criteria for quality and beauty with flying colors. The models are beautiful and the video and still media are of exceeding quality. Unlike other glam sites like Met-Art and Hegre-Art, Digital Desire is a young site that still needs to beef up its archive some more. I'm not complaining really. I expect the updates to outpace my download speed anyway. I may never keep up. My compliments to the Digital Desire (DDGirls) founder J.S. Hicks.
One comment













One or more comments are waiting for approval by an editor.