My Opinion

Snailsreviews has been online a few weeks when my Webmaster asked me about Met-Art. I had put Met-Art on top of my list of favorite sites. It's not that Gecko had never heard of Met-Art, it's just that he'd always had the impression that this gorgeous site was too softcore for him. Well, I reminded him that I was more than an extreme hardcore fan than he was, and some of the peeing and fisting sites I've recommended to him simply turned him off, and even the fact that those sites were populated by some of the cutest young models you've ever could not change his mind. But Gecko's curiosity got the better of him and recently he invited Met-Art to give us a free look at their brand new site.

While Met-Art.com has taken care to maintain its old archives and the class factor of its state-of-the-art website, it must be very proud of its new improved navigational features. It's almost certain that members will not only content themselves in the simple pleasure of downloading Met-Art pics and videos, they'll also enjoy browsing around and checking out familiar picture sets and covers, with a pause here and there to admire the exciting features such as pop-up navigation browser options (yes you can choose between “enhanced” or simple navigation and between high rez and low rez navigation)

Along with the access codes, Met-Art sent us a fact sheet that contains a few surprises for me. I've always thought that Met-Art was only three or four years old. To my surprise it's a lot older than that. Met-Art is in its 8th year online and have produced 300k photographs and 300 movies of 1300 beautiful models. The number of superb babes that have been photographed by Met-Art photographers is simply astounding to me. I've been going to the hippest clubs for ten years and I haven't seen that many babes, much less thirteen hundred, in the same league as these Met-Art models. With that in mind, ity's not an exaggerration to say that Met-Art a godsend for people obsessed with beautiful women (Met-Art). If you ask me, it's a public service.

Too bad that Met-Art has produced only 300 movies out of the 1300 models that they have photographed. Of course, you can't expect beauties Iveta and Jenya D to agree to a film shoot on their first time out. In fact, I don't expect many of the models at Met-Art to ever come out in a softcore film. Yes, it makes me sad, sad to imagine that selfish rich bastards have taken Danae or Monika C out of the public view and sincere lovers of female perfection like me will be another two sirens short.

Met-Art is the first site in the world to introduce the magazine cover presentation. Each photo set of the models has a magazine-like cover with a title. It makes everything very exciting, especially with photo sets like “Speechless” where the angelic brunette Monika C tosses and turns on a white satin bed. In 2400x1602 high-rez photos, this very young beauty makes you want to go out and drain your bank account on the most expensive engagement ring you can find. The low-rez pics are not that bad at 1024x681. (Also expect to come across photo resolution of up to 4000 pixels.)

Though Met-Art is primarily a site for nude photographers to showcase their work, the 300 movies available in the site are an attraction all their own. The site is so full of features that it will take months to fully enjoy everything it has to offer. Watching Met-Art videos is an exercise in temperance, especially with all the formats to choose from. There are six (6) formats available if you wish to download a movie: DivX, MPEG, WMV, Quicktime or H264, PSP and iPod. You get the best quality on the DivX format followed by the MPEG. Some movies at Met-Art are in high-definition. I usually download in MPEG or DivX and the resolution I get is quite extraordinary. Some of these movies can be huge. I would say 50MB to 100MB is average, and average movie length is about ten minutes. I've tried all six formats except the iPod, but only because I hate walking with an erection.

Of course, every movie depends on the man behind the camera. I have to be honest that I don't like it when the director and camera man decides one that he's going to be artist. What for, when all you have to do is point a high-resolution video camera a nude nymphet. I do not like what the director of Alena I's 2006/09/01 video did. It's a disaster in my opinion. A red-hot angel complete with wings, and what does the director do but shoot her with an Internet camera. Horrible!